|
|
|
Tomorrows
Game News Index
|
|
|
February 23, 2010
|
OHA won't open its books to members |
|
February
20. 2010 |
Tomorrow's
Game benched |
|
February
12, 2010
|
OHF ruling stall Tomorrow's Game Plan
|
|
February
12, 2010
|
Amateur junior overhaul on hold |
|
February 02, 2010
|
Proposed Premier hockey league on thin ice |
|
January 04, 2010 |
Delhi not crazy about Tomorrow Game |
|
January
02, 2010 |
D-level
teams agree to join junior C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OHA won’t open its books to
members
February 23, 2010
By Jeff Hicks, Record staff
CAMBRIDGE — The Ontario Hockey Association has
refused to open its books to its own paying
members.
All thirty-six provincial junior A hockey clubs
have demanded the not-for-profit OHA submit all
financial records to be scrutinized by Al Rosen,
one of Canada’s leading forensic accountants.
The OHA, which governs all levels of amateur jr.
hockey from Kingston to Windsor, has spurned the
request.
“We believe all of the books and records of the
OHA should be accessible to all members,” said
Marc Mercier, the chairperson of the provincial
jr. A league. “Any attempt to not be fully
transparent should be met with a great deal of
suspicion.”
On Feb. 12, OHA president Brent Ladds gave some
financial information requested by Mercier.
But Ladds wouldn’t open up the ledgers to Rosen,
who has been retained by Mercier’s group.
“The OHA has provided to you all of the
information to which you are entitled to under
the Corporations Act,” Ladds said in the letter.
“You are not entitled to any further
information. . . no further information is
forthcoming.”
Yesterday, Ladds said the OHA had handed over
the Jr. A members’ request to the OHA’s legal
department. Ladds said it would be up to OHA
lawyers to determine if further information
would be given out.
“We want to make sure we do the right thing for
our membership,” Ladds said.
Ladds noted the OHA’s audited financial
statements are presented for members questions
and approval at the organization’s annual
general meeting.
“We’ve got nothing to hide,” Ladds said.
The latest sizzling salvo in the war between the
Jr. A clubs and the OHA follows a legal battle
that cost each side about $50,000 in lawyer’s
fees.
The OHA had proposed a new Premier League to
start up next season featuring elite players
from the current Jr. A and Jr. B levels, which
are essentially the same calibre.
All 36 Jr. A teams and 25 Jr. B teams were
invited to apply to the league.
Applications were to included a $25,000 fee to
the OHA by Feb. 1.
The Jr. A teams successfully appealed the
creation of the Premier loop, and accompanying
overhaul of the junior system, to the governing
Ontario Hockey Federation. The OHF ordered the
OHA go back and consult more with its’ members
before pushing the Premier loop through.
Essentially, it has been delayed at least one
year.
The Jr. A teams, who pay about $7,500 a year to
be OHA members, are miffed at having to spend
$50,000 to fight the organization that’s
supposed to represent them. Mercier says they
are fighting for greater accountability,
transparency and accessibility with the OHA.
Mercier said the Jr. A clubs are not interested
in going outlaw, nor to they want Ladds removed.
“This is not a witch hunt,” said Mercier, who
owns the Jr. A Cobourg Cougars.
“This is all about trying to assist our
association to try to become the best
association it can be.”
Meanwhile, the local Jr. B loop — which includes
teams in Cambridge, Kitchener, Waterloo, Elmira,
Guelph, Listowel and Stratford — is on the
sidelines wondering what all the financial fuss
from the Jr. A teams is about.
“Maybe they’re hinting at something I’m
missing,” said Greater Ontario Junior Hockey
League chair Shawn McKelvie, who represents the
Jr. B teams.
“As far as I’m concerned, there has been full
disclosure. The ability to ask questions on any
of those financials has always been available
(at the AGM). I don’t know what it is they’re
not already seeing.”
McKelvie says, to his knowledge, no Jr. B teams
have questioned OHA finances.
Still, the Waterloo Siskins, who sought to join
the Premier loop, see merit in the Jr. A efforts
to open the books.
“I agree with the move to have full disclosure
of all financial information,” Siskins president
Richard Burjoski said. The activities of the OHA
continue to become more complicated — deals with
Bauer Hockey and Pointstreak — and require more
regular scrutiny.”
The OHA has a deal with Bauer to provide hockey
products at a discount.
Pointstreak runs on-line league web sites for
the OHA.
The Siskins pay $6,300 a season in OHA dues.
They also pay $1,300 for insurance and $2,400 to
the Greater Ontario loop.
Regardless, the Jr. A and Jr. B clubs have never
outgrown their sibling rivalry that sees them
fighting over a dwindling number of elite
players, since Hockey Canada cut them out of the
development path five years ago.
They’ve never been able to see themselves as
allies in any endeavour.
Mercier believes the OHA needs to change in
order to boost sagging Jr. A fortunes and
opening the books to Rosen would be a start.
“We are deeply concerned that our association
has fallen out of touch with its members,” he
said.
“This is one of a number of steps aimed at
reforming the OHA.”
jhicks@therecord.com
Back
To Top
|
|
20
Feb. 2010
Tomorrow's Game benched
The Brantford Golden Eagles wait
and see approach to Tomorrow's Game seems to
have been the right move now that the Ontario
Hockey Association's initiative has been benched
While the Golden Eagles saw only
two of its Greater Ontario Junior Hockey League
brothers apply for the initiative's Premier
league, the Ontario Hockey Federation has put
the OHA idea on hold, for now.
After hearing
an appeal on behalf of all 36 Junior A teams,
the OHF told OHA president Brent Ladds that the
restructuring of junior hockey won't be
happening next season.
The OHF decision came after the
Ontario Junior Hockey League and Central Junior
Hockey League decided to drop the gloves with
the OHA's idea of a Premier division, which was
set to begin next fall.
One of the GOJHL teams that did
apply for the Premier league is the Cambridge
Winter Hawks.
"There are some kinks that need
to be worked out but I am confident it will
happen, even if it takes a year or 24 months to
dot the i's and cross the t's," said Cambridge
Winter Hawks president Joe Machado. "It's just
going to be a matter of discussion and
diplomacy. When it happens, we want to be ready.
We're working diligently to bring the club to a
higher level of hockey which the community would
support."
The OHF indicated that they're on
board with the OHA in its concept of the
proposed Premier league but feel the criteria
needs to be more defined.
The Premier league was to have 16
teams next season, with hopes that it would
expand the following year. The Junior A teams
felt it was in their best interest to protect
themselves since many of the 36 teams would
either become extinct, or relegated to another
league with the Tomorrow's Game intiative.
"I think that our Junior A
category has a lot of work to do and talk is
cheap," said Tim Clayden, vice-chair of the OJHL.
"Although the OHF decision may be seen as a
small victory by some, that is exactly what it
is and very small at that. We need to stop
talking and start implementing some of the
unique initiatives that we have all been talking
too much about for more than three years now in
order to make our league one of the best for
high-end NCAA and OHL prospects to want to play
in. Most importantly we need to get down to 28
and maybe 24 teams as early as next season in
order to practice what we're preaching.
"We also have to find the middle
ground to not only work within the OHA, we must
start to work together with each OHA category,
including the Bs, Cs and Ds," he said.
The OHA could still force the
Tomorrow's Game but not without providing more
details on how the new loop will work.
"If it is not supported we have
to revisit it to make sure we're making
progress," Ladds said. "It's clear we share the
same bottom line, but a different process for
getting there. I think the important thing is to
get it right and be patient enough to get where
we have to go."
Back
To Top
|
|
YORK REGIONAL John Cudmore Feb 12, 2010
OHF ruling stalls Tomorrow’s Game plan
Tomorrow’s Game will have to wait until another
day.
The Ontario Hockey Association’s plan to
restructure junior hockey in its jurisdiction
for the 2010-11 season was stalled when the
Ontario Hockey Federation announced Thursday its
decision to uphold an appeal from the 36
franchises in the former Ontario Junior Hockey
League to block the concept.
The 36 teams argued the initiative to create an
elite division and two developmental levels
among the 130-plus franchises that comprise the
OHA breached constitutional issues and could not
proceed in its presented form.
The implementation of Tomorrow’s Game would have
impacted junior hockey from A to D calibres.
For now, the OHF ruling keeps intact the 36
members of the OJHL that split this season to
form the Central Canadian Hockey League and
Ontario Junior A Hockey League.
However, those teams offered earlier to reduce
the number of teams starting with next season as
a response to Tomorrow’s Game.
“I think that our junior A category has a lot of
work to do and talk is cheap,” said Tim Clayden,
vice-chair of the 15-team OJAHL Thursday
afternoon. “Although the OHF decision may be
seen as a small victory by some, that is exactly
what it is and very small at that. We need to
stop talking and start implementing some of the
unique initiatives that we have all been talking
too much about for more than three years now in
order to make our league one of the best for
high-end NCAA and OHL prospects to want to play
in.
“Most importantly we need to get down to 28 and
maybe 24 teams as early as next season in order
to practice what we’re preaching.”
The Tomorrow’s Game concept was intended to
bring together top franchises from the Junior A
ranks, and eventually from the Junior B level,
to develop a premier brand of hockey along with
stringent and professional operating methods.
“We also have to find the middle ground to not
only work within the OHA, we must start to work
together with each OHA category, including the
B’s, C’s and D’s.”
OHA president Brent Ladds said the ruling is not
the end of attempting to restructure junior
hockey.
“If it is not supported we have to re-visit it
to make sure we’re making progress,” he said.
“It’s clear we share the same bottom line, but a
different process for getting there. I think the
important thing is to get it right and be
patient enough to get where we have to go.”
Most of the 36 teams voted in December to
withhold applications to apply for Tomorrow’s
Game and in doing so paralysed the Tomorrow’s
Game concept.
The OHA board is scheduled to meet Feb. 17 to
discuss and analyse the decision of the OHF,
according to Ladds.

|
|
Amateur junior hockey overhaul on hold
By Jeff Hicks
Feb 12, 2010
Large
Medium
Small
Print
This Article
Tell a
friend
CAMBRIDGE — The Ontario Hockey Association’s
massive overhaul of amateur junior hockey in the
province appears to be on ice.
“There’s strong reason to be believe this puts
it on hold,” OHA president Brent Ladds said
Thursday, after an Ontario Hockey Federation
ruling had revolting Jr. A teams claiming
victory in their legal battle against the
formation of a new Premier league to start next
fall.
The governing OHF, after hearing an appeal from
all 36 Jr. A clubs last Thursday, told Ladds to
go back to the clubs for more consultation.
The OHA could still force the “Tomorrow’s Game”
plan down the gagging throats of wary member
clubs, but not without providing more details on
how the Premier league will work.
“There’s no chance of this proceeding this
coming season,” said Cobourg Jr. A Cougars owner
Marc Mercier, who sits on the executive boards
of both Jr. A leagues. “It’s clear that the OHA
operated in a fashion that’s fast and loose and
disregarded its members rights.”
The Jr. A teams say the OHA didn’t follow proper
procedures in constructing the “Premier”
concept.
In December, the OHA invited every Jr. A team
and 25 Jr. B teams to apply by Feb. 1 — and pay
a $25,000 fee — for membership to the Premier
loop.
Only two teams planned to ante up, the Jr. B
Cambridge Winter Hawks and Waterloo Siskins.
Hawks president Joe Machado declined comment.
The Siskins plan to remain a Jr. B entity for a
76th year.
“They’re basically going to have to go back to
the drawing board,” said Siskins president
Richard Burjoski, who figures the Premier league
will still materialize with the planned 16 or
more teams in 2011.
“I think the year after, it’ll happen.”
The Premier concept and the creation of two
other development levels was the OHA’s scheme to
make amateur junior hockey relevant again.
Top players would be funneled onto “Premier”
teams, who would operate with budgets in the
$300,000 range or higher.
It’s also a way of trimming the ridiculous
number of Jr. A and Jr. B teams, which are
essentially the same calibre.
Of course, the OHA was responsible for creating
the glut of franchises in the first place. As
well, the Premier concept does nothing to
address the dearth of elite talent at the jr. A
and B levels, where once-ubiquitous NHL, OHL and
college scouts have become as scarce as
Vancouver snow.
Five years ago, Hockey Canada took amateur
junior hockey out of the developmental loop with
legislation that diverts elite players to the
professional junior ranks of the Canadian Hockey
League. That matter has not been addressed.
For now, the Premier loop scheme is in limbo.
The OHA board, which meets next Wednesday, must
regroup.
The OHA and the Jr. A clubs could still appeal
the OHF ruling to Hockey Canada.
Eventually, change must come to junior hockey in
Ontario or its reputation as the path to pickup
will be solidified.
“We’re looking forward to working with the OHA,”
Mercier said.
“It would be in the best interest of the OHA to
spend a little time getting to understand its
members.”
The “Tomorrow’s Game” concept has been two years
in the making and was discussed by OHA members
last June.
No matter how much consultation there is, any
move to eliminate franchises will be
controversial.
“The goal of all of this is to shrink it,”
Burjoski said. “Any time you do that, you’re
going to break some hearts.”

|
|
Proposed Premier hockey league on thin ice
February 02, 2010
By Jeff Hicks, Record staff
Flat-lining before the first faceoff.
Such is the state of the proposed Premier loop
and the Ontario Hockey Association’s master plan
to re-make the face of amateur junior hockey in
the province.
In December, the OHA invited all 36 junior A
clubs and all 25 Jr. B outfits to apply by Feb.
1 to become a member of the new elite “Premier”
circuit next fall.
No teams have applied. No $25,000 entry fees
have been collected.
Sure, the deadline is extended thanks to Ontario
Hockey Federation order.
An appeal challenging the legality of the OHA’s
“Tomorrow’s Game” concept — which includes the
Premier league — is to be heard by the governing
OHF in Toronto on Thursday.
But even OHA president Brent Ladds doesn’t
expect a flood of Premier applications should an
OHF panel rule in his favour late this week or
next.
“You can always perceive when there’s a stampede
at the door,” Ladds said Tuesday.
“I checked this morning and that field looked
kind of empty.”
The “Tomorrow’s Game” concept, which would also
merge Jr. C and D hockey, has been in
development for two years and discussed at OHA
general meetings.
Still, all 36 junior A clubs are fighting the
Premier proposal, claiming the OHA has no right
to create a new top-level of junior hockey,
especiallly against the wishes of its member
teams.
Only two Jr. B clubs, the Waterloo Siskins and
Cambridge Winter Hawks, proclaimed they planned
to join the Premier rank, ante up the $25,000
and submit a business plan in excess of
$300,000.
But, as of Tuesday, even the Siskins and Hawks
waffled.
Siskins president Richard Burjoski wanted to
know how the OHA expected him to invest $25,000
into such a “mess”.
“Would you invest in a business that is in
conflict with their top — in their minds — 36
franchises?” Burjoski said in an email.
“They don’t seem to have a plan, at least one
that gives comfort to investors.”
Jr. A is considered a higher level of hockey in
OHA eyes, although the calibre of play in Jr. B
is essentially the same.
The Premier league concept was the OHA’s
response to the declining quality and status of
Jr. A and Jr. B hockey.
Elite players from both loops were supposed to
be funnelled into a new 16-team circuit
featuring the OHA’s best.
But two teams do not a Premier league make.
Winter Hawks co-owner Joe Machado said, via
email, his club’s application is being withheld
until the OHF rules.
The Siskins, once eagerly pro-premier, are now
wary.
“We do want to see what happens,” Burjoski said.
“But we have to decide if we want to be part of
a small league that is hastily thrown together.”
The Siskins board plans to meet after the OHF
rules.
Burjoski believes it likely that an outlaw
league will spring up in Greater Toronto for
next season.
The Jr. A teams aren’t ready to call the Premier
plan a corpse just yet.
“I can’t say that it’s dead dead,” said
Cobourg Jr. A Cougars owner Marc Mercier, who
sits on the executive boards of both provincial
Jr. A leagues.
“But when you have zero applicants to an
initiative of this magnitude — that is offered
by the OHA without the support of its members —
you are left to wonder what’s going to happen
here.”
Mercier plans to attend Thursday’s OHF hearing,
which was pushed back from last week.
jhicks@therecord.com

|
|
4 Jan. 10
Delhi
not crazy about 'Tomorrow's Game'
By JACOB ROBINSON SIMCOE REFORMER
If the
Delhi Travellers are going to win their first SOJHL title, this is
the year to do it.
With
the proposed "Tomorrow's Game" a realignment of the entire OHA, the
junior development league appears to be on its last legs, and it's
something the team isn't happy about.
The
OHA's plan includes wiping the slate clean in terms of the current
junior hockey system and starting fresh with levels of premier,
division 1 and division 2.
Teams
can apply for whichever level fits them best. For those in the SOJHL,
it means competing with current Junior C and possibly even some
Junior B teams.
"Personally, why fix something that's not broke? Everybody seems to
be happy with where they are -- we are. Why are they making big
changes? My personal feeling is, I can't believe anyone would want
to do it," said Travellers general manager Ron Lazou.
"It's
hard enough to win the Junior D title, now you're going into a
league where you don't have a chance?"
Lazou
said that whatever the Junior C Simcoe Storm and Norwich Merchants
decide to do would have a direct result on the franchise. In theory,
all three teams could be playing in the same league along with the
Port Dover Sailors, but Lazou doesn't see that scenario playing out.
"For
us it's Simcoe and Norwich on either side of us -- what they do
matters to us. I can't see either one of them staying D2, why would
they," he said.
"Our
whole league is going to apply for D2 and see where it goes from
there."
Ontario Hockey Association Junior C chair John Kastner confirmed
over the weekend that the entire SOJHL loop has filed to join Junior
C as a standalone league next year.
"The
SOJHL has given notice to the OHA that it would like to play in the
junior C category next year as a unit," Kastner told QMI Agency.
"If
the application is accepted, they'd move to C next fall. Somewhere
down the road, perhaps in a year or two, we'd start looking at
things such as realignment. But for the first year, they'd prefer to
stay together."
Not
all teams were against the move though. St. George Dukes general
manager told QMI Agency that his organization is excited to make the
move up a level.
"I
think it's great," Strauch said. "We are affiliated with a Junior B
team and by us being a C team, it will help us out. Players get sent
down and some don't want to come here because we're a Junior D team.
This is a good thing."
When
the league last met with the OHA to discuss the plan, Lazou said
teams were told there would only be a limited amount of teams
allowed in the premier division, which would leave more than 100
clubs between the other two divisions.
"If
you split that in half, it comes out to about 55 teams in each
division. That's a lot of teams to have a playoff ," Lazou said.
"You
could be playing hockey in June."
Back
To Top
|
2 Jan.
10
JUNIOR HOCKEY
By DARRYL G. SMART - Brantford Expositor
Junior D hockey is one step closer to becoming extinct.
"The SOJHL (Southern Ontario Junior Hockey League) has given notice
to the OHA that it would like to play in the junior C category next
year as a unit," Ontario Hockey Association junior C chair John
Kastner said.
"If the application is accepted, they'd move to C next fall.
Somewhere down the road, perhaps in a year or two, we'd start
looking at things such as realignment. But for the first year,
they'd prefer to stay together."
The realignment is part of the OHA's project entitled, Tomorrow's
Game, which could result in an overhaul of the province's junior
hockey leagues and affect teams such as the Brantford Golden Eagles,
which currently play in the Greater Ontario Junior Hockey League for
junior B teams.
St. George Dukes general manager Tom Strauch said he was told the
league will stay together but we'll be junior C teams next year.
Strauch said he, along with the other teams in the SOJHL loop are
excited for the move.
"I think it's great," Strauch said. "We are affiliated with a junior
B team and by us being a C team, it will help us out. Players get
sent down and some don't want to come here because we're a junior D
team. This is a good thing."
Strauch said another positive from the move is that his team won't
lose as many players to other teams.
"One of the things about junior D is you'll always lose players to
junior C teams," Strauch said. "That won't happen as much anymore."
He admitted that a majority of the teams in the SOJHL currently can
compete with a majority of junior C teams, so a move in
classification isn't going to hurt teams. Proof of this is the
Mitchell Hawks, who bolted from the SOJHL to junior C this season.
"There will always be the powerhouses like Norwich (Merchants) and
Simcoe (Storm) that throw money at players," Strauch said.
"I think with what we have in St. George, we will compete. We have a
really good program here where we provide kids a place to play. When
we get to junior C we aren't going to throw money at kids like some
teams do. We're going to do what we're doing now -give kids a place
to play competitive hockey, give them a chance to win and supply
them with some equipment."
In Burford, Bulldogs general manager Bill Wallace said a move to
junior C was inevitable and as a result, that went into the planning
for this season's team.
"When we came to Burford this season, there was a movement to make
the team younger, to develop the kids for the future," Wallace said.
"Knowing they'll be playing in junior C next year, we wanted to
recruit kids that would be able to develop and immediately be able
to compete at that level when it all happens."
Wallace said, although the Bulldogs (6-12-1) don't currently have a
winning record, the team is on the right track.
"I think we'll be solid," Wallace said. "We potentially may just
lose two players and we're competing already. We'll be a year more
experienced and that will help us next year."
If this plan comes to fruition, the one problem Wallace said there
may be is recruiting boundaries.
In Brant alone, the Bulldogs will compete with the Dukes and Paris
Mounties, not to mention their Norfolk neighbours in Simcoe, Delhi
and Port Dover, as well as their Oxford neighbours in Woodstock and
Norwich.
Should the SOJHL find itself under the junior C umbrella next year,
and no other movement takes place in other categories, there will be
61 teams at the C level.
"I sense there is a lot of support to (merge) for next year, all
things being equal," Kastner told Sun Media in April.
"There are some issues but there is a will to get those resolved."
In April, the OHA sent a five question survey to its junior C and D
teams, mostly gauging their support of a merger and its potential
effects. Although the reaction from teams in both leagues was mainly
negative, there have been other realignment options passed around.
Back
To Top |
|